Comprehensive coverage, analysis, and breaking news on criminal justice.
Following a bold order by a CJM to register FIRs against police officers accused of killing civilians in the 2024 Sambhal violence, questions linger around a transfer, a High Court stay, and the tensions of criminal procedure.
Tanishka Shah
Staff Writer
In their differing verdicts earlier this week on prior government approval to investigate corruption by public servants, Justices K.V. Viswanathan and B.V. Nagarathna explored to what extent reading down an unconstitutional statutory provision was permissible.
A close reading of the Delhi High Court’s suspension of sentence in the Unnao rape case highlights the risks of resolving statutory meanings at the interim stage.
In its judgement, coming only a day after its decision in the Delhi riots case, the Court noted that prolonged incarceration of undertrials converts pretrial detention into a form of punishment.
The application seeking provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Sudharatmak Sevayen Evam Bandigrah Adhiniyam, 2024 to be struck down argues that it contravenes the Sukanya Shantha (2024) decision.
The acquittal brings to fore the immense significance of the Supreme Court-innovated extraordinary jurisdiction of curative, specifically in cases concerning life and liberty and death penalty.
The Bench held that if the time frame for supplying the grounds of arrest in writing is not adhered to, the arrest would be rendered illegal, entitling the release of the arrestee.
With 947 hate-related incidents reported between June 2024 and June 2025, Indian courts have increasingly faced the challenge of separating genuine perpetrators from innocent bystanders in cases of collective violence.
Our summary of the Supreme Court's 78 page judgment, which practitioners have claimed "has far-reaching implications for the future".
In India, there are limited options for children in conflict with the law. The lack of structured support and care for children is resultantly a prevailing issue.
The top Court had, on October 17, 2025, taken suo motu cognisance of a complaint filed by a senior citizen couple from Ambala, Haryana, who were defrauded of ₹1.05 crore.
More than seven decades after independence, the State and its institutions appear strikingly detached from the ethos of transformative constitutionalism—nowhere more evident than in their continued reliance on and justification of the preventive detention regime.
Acquitted in the 7/11 Mumbai blasts case, a prison rights activist reviews the prison memoir of another - a searing reading on intellectual stifling, of loosening faith in the judiciary, and why the Bhima Koregaon case is a landmark indeed.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal submitted that the amendment was necessary as the authorities had only recently provided the grounds of detention.
The petition seeks judicial guidelines to ensure that voting restrictions apply only under defined and proportionate circumstances.
Acquitted after nine years in prison in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, a prison rights activist reflects on the one piece of evidence that stood above all else: confession under Section 18 of MCOCA, and all that was taken from him.
Almost half of our legislators have criminal records. But can the solution to this be a constitutional amendment that potentially erodes constitutional safeguards? In this explainer, we break down the debate in the simplest terms.
“Why is the trial not going on, and for how many years can a person be kept in custody without trial?” the bench asked.
Justice Sundresh questioned whether defamation involving private individuals can legitimately be classified as a crime when it serves no broader public purpose. In 2016, the Court had upheld the constitutionality of the criminal defamation law.
Financial impropriety, administrative breakdown and a Supreme Court order noting that a sexual harassment case “must haunt the [Vice-Chancellor] forever” - students at the national law university say that their assertion is against “persistent apathy”.
In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack in May earlier this year, a Quran teacher was killed protecting children in Kashmir’s Poonch by Pakistan’s shelling. News 18, Republic TV and Zee News called him a terrorist who was eliminated. With little to lose, his family now seeks reparations.
In a string of recent orders by sessions courts and the Orissa High Court, accused from Dalit and Adivasi communities have been directed to engage in forced labour as a condition of their grant of bail. Despite the top Court’s censure of caste-coded impositions in our criminal justice system, courts have not shied in treating life, liberty and dignity malleably.
Marking 73 years of the repeal of the Criminal Tribes Act, Justice Prakash noted that the barriers faced by children from De-notified Tribe communities needed to be discussed more widely.
The 130th Constitution Amendment Bill seeks to achieve what was never constitutionally imagined, traps opposition ministers in an absurd cycle of criminalisation and disqualification, and raises the question: if it ever goes through, will our courts be able to do much?
Taking note that the Haryana police SIT had seized Mahmudabad’s devices, the Court asked why the SIT was “misdirecting itself” despite earlier order to not expand scope of investigation.
Speaking to The Leaflet, senior counsel Rebecca John said that cross-examination, by its nature, is meant to be a physical exercise and the LG’s move was a “travesty of justice”.
While critics have argued that the amendment can be weaponised against opposition ministers selectively, others have pointed out that it, in fact, enables jailed ministers to remain in power for a month, questioning whether it does enough.
Allegations in the case include awarding higher compensation to certain landowners who were not entitled to it.
Despite clear legal provisions under the POSH Act, the absence of ward-level Nodal Officers in Delhi has left thousands of women domestic workers without accessible redressal mechanisms.
Bar associations pressed that summons to advocates must be issued only after the approval of a judicial magistrate.
When procedural abuse becomes an institutional habit, who ultimately pays the price? The SC’s 2024 decision in Tushar Rajnikantbhai Shah gave some important answers.
The recent arrest of two nuns in Chhattisgarh under anti-conversion and NIA laws reveals the fictional limits of the Indian State’s persecution of religious freedom, all at the cost of due process.
Thirteen years since its enactment, the POCSO Act has emerged as a double-edged sword, punishing young men for consensual relationships. Now a Supreme Court challenge has ushered a chance for reform.
A recent central government report finds, abysmally, that registration of cases under the Protection of Civil Rights Act fell down to only 13 in 2022, as several states said they had ‘NIL’ information of the law’s implementation.
The Court noted that the severity of the torture shocked its conscience, and the case exposed deep institutional bias within the police institution.
The Andhra Pradesh HC’s recent circular, which directs judicial magistrates to comply with the SC decisions in Pratapgarhi and Arnesh Kumar, is a welcome move, but exposes faultlines.
Editor’s note: Exactly four years ago today, Fr. Stan Swamy died in judicial custody due to medical negligence in what many objectively term as an ‘institutional killing.’ Recalling his life and legacy dedicated to the Dalit and Adivasi rights movements, fifteen friends, warped themselves in the Bhima Koregaon case, some released, some still incarcerated, are today observing a one day hunger strike. Activist and poet P. Varavara Rao, ailing through ill health, also stands in solidarity and spirit. Below are their reasons.
A new fact-finding report by PUCL, ACPR and AILAJ Karnataka finds crucial lapses in investigation into the mob lynching of Mohd Ashraf. In Dakshin Kannada’s communally volatile atmosphere, the demand for a fair enforcement of the SC’s mob-lynching guidelines becomes crucial.
On the UN’s International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, we reflect on a recent report by a global alliance of anti-torture organisations which scored India as ‘high risk’ overall. Between India’s refusal to ratify the Convention Against Torture and the downgrading of the NHRC, the country is facing a critical moment in its human rights stature.
The Court’s observations come amidst widespread condemnation of ED summoning two senior advocates. The bench framed two primary issues and also sent the matter to the CJI's bench for appropriate orders.