Comprehensive coverage, analysis, and breaking news on due process.
Fourth part of the five-part series examining the forcible expulsion of Indian citizens to Bangladesh based on unverified suspicions of illegal migration, conducted without due process
South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre
Staff Writer
Third part of the five-part series examining the forcible expulsion of Indian citizens to Bangladesh based on unverified suspicions of illegal migration, conducted without due process
Second part of the five-part series examining the forcible expulsion of Indian citizens to Bangladesh based on unverified suspicions of illegal migration, conducted without due process
First part of the five-part series examining the forcible expulsion of Indian citizens to Bangladesh based on unverified suspicions of illegal migration, conducted without due process
A November 2025 judgment of Gurugram’s labour court captures a forgotten history of a dangerous state and corporate nexus, nation-building at the cost of workers dignity, and a labour movement that refuses to die.
With a batch of petitions seeking to answer whether Rohingyas are refugees, and a habeas corpus enquiring about the custodial disappearance of five people in May, the Court in January must address crucial issues on the fate of the world’s most persecuted minority in India.
The acquittal brings to fore the immense significance of the Supreme Court-innovated extraordinary jurisdiction of curative, specifically in cases concerning life and liberty and death penalty.
The Bench held that if the time frame for supplying the grounds of arrest in writing is not adhered to, the arrest would be rendered illegal, entitling the release of the arrestee.
With 947 hate-related incidents reported between June 2024 and June 2025, Indian courts have increasingly faced the challenge of separating genuine perpetrators from innocent bystanders in cases of collective violence.
Our summary of the Supreme Court's 78 page judgment, which practitioners have claimed "has far-reaching implications for the future".
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Angmo, argued that the detention was illegal under Article 22 of the Constitution as the grounds of detention had not been furnished to the family.
Acquitted after nine years in prison in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, a prison rights activist reflects on the one piece of evidence that stood above all else: confession under Section 18 of MCOCA, and all that was taken from him.
In June, bulldozers razed down a Kali temple in Bhoomiheen camp in Delhi. Selective application of zoning laws, nuisance doctrines, environmental norms and master plans have enabled demolition of mazārs, dargāhs and wayside shrines of working class devotees - clipping away the last remnants of citizenship entitlements for the poor across India’s cities.
Almost half of our legislators have criminal records. But can the solution to this be a constitutional amendment that potentially erodes constitutional safeguards? In this explainer, we break down the debate in the simplest terms.
Speaking to The Leaflet, senior counsel Rebecca John said that cross-examination, by its nature, is meant to be a physical exercise and the LG’s move was a “travesty of justice”.
When procedural abuse becomes an institutional habit, who ultimately pays the price? The SC’s 2024 decision in Tushar Rajnikantbhai Shah gave some important answers.
The committee is of the prima facie view that there could be foul play on behalf of advocates appearing for real estate builder Roop Bansal.
The recent arrest of two nuns in Chhattisgarh under anti-conversion and NIA laws reveals the fictional limits of the Indian State’s persecution of religious freedom, all at the cost of due process.
The withdrawal of Vikas Barala’s appointment as a law officer, after outcry over a pending criminal matter daringly filed by the survivor showed that, where the accused quietly becomes the authority, public attention can fill the gaps of constitutional necessity .
The appointment of Barala, who is facing criminal charges in a stalking case, and its subsequent withdrawal reveals clearly an institutional architecture that is vulnerable to politicisation.
Justice Varma’s writ petition seeks not fairness, but a do-over — and bypasses the process he already partook in. At the heart, at stake is the judiciary’s integrity and the faith of thousands of litigants who knock on the court’s door.
A peaceful pro-Palestine rally at Delhi’s Nehru market was rocked by a hyper-nationalist mob of intruders. As tensions escalated, Delhi police first stood by and watched, and then closed in on the protestors to detain and charge them. One reporter saw it all.
The Andhra Pradesh HC’s recent circular, which directs judicial magistrates to comply with the SC decisions in Pratapgarhi and Arnesh Kumar, is a welcome move, but exposes faultlines.
The Schedule of the Arbitration Act comprehensively addresses concerns of bias. But there are rare and exceptional circumstances when a departure can be concerned, and while a 2023 Delhi HC verdict illustrates that, it should not treated as a general standard.
On July 10, the SC asked ECI to “consider” including the Aadhar, EPIC and ration cards in its list of documents on the intensive revision of voter lists. On a macro-scale, the ECI’s move in Bihar, which disenfranchises lacks of voters from marginalised communities, is an effacement of due process, and its integrity as a fourth-branch institution.
A new fact-finding report by PUCL, ACPR and AILAJ Karnataka finds crucial lapses in investigation into the mob lynching of Mohd Ashraf. In Dakshin Kannada’s communally volatile atmosphere, the demand for a fair enforcement of the SC’s mob-lynching guidelines becomes crucial.
Since the US military aircraft attacks on three Iranian nuclear facilities last week, international law experts have been split on whether there was a violation of international law. A close examination of the attack makes clear that they constituted ‘aggression’, an aggravated form of ‘use of force’, and hence the U.S.’s position of portraying the attacks as self-defence is largely untenable.
On the UN’s International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, we reflect on a recent report by a global alliance of anti-torture organisations which scored India as ‘high risk’ overall. Between India’s refusal to ratify the Convention Against Torture and the downgrading of the NHRC, the country is facing a critical moment in its human rights stature.
The Court’s observations come amidst widespread condemnation of ED summoning two senior advocates. The bench framed two primary issues and also sent the matter to the CJI's bench for appropriate orders.
On the top of our mind should be a sustained campaign for impeachment and prosecution, all through due process. But from a big picture perspective: how do we make sense of eroding public faith in the judiciary, and can we do so without bringing to question the wider conditions of democratic backsliding under this government?
A recent report has suggested that the SC stopped short of an in-house inquiry against Justice Yadav after the Rajya Sabha Secretariat claimed exclusive jurisdiction. A progressive lawyer’s body has now revived a long-stalled push to initiate enquiry and demand unconditional apology from the Allahabad HC judge.
While the Tamil Nadu police has been consistently lauded as among the best in the country, recent RTI information revealed that in 2024, three hundred inmates entered prison with broken limbs, petty offenders were more vulnerable to custodial torture and police stations rarely had CCTV facilities.
The India Justice Report, 2025 notes that more than half the jails in India are overcrowded, with nearly 176 prisons housing as many inmates as four times their sanctioned capacity. At the base of the issue are abuse of arrest powers in disregard of the criminal laws, delayed investigations and a government push for decongestion that is only rhetorical.
The law laid down by the Supreme Court on sanction for prosecution is inherently contradictory, the outcome of each decision at the mercy of the precedent relied upon. Despite reforms to the criminal laws, an archaic provision rooted in a colonial procedure survives, and in disharmony with our constitutional scheme.
In March, the Madhya Pradesh chief minister proposed to amend MP’s existing anti conversion law to include the death penalty. The proposal not only belittles the high threshold of the rarest of rare doctrine, but also further emboldens the constitutionally contested anti-conversion laws.
The doctrine of unconstitutional state of affairs, originated in Colombia, pushes to examine constitutional violations at a more structural, rather than individual level. Could invoking the principle be the most effective answer to the systemic and collusive injustice in the Jaim Bhim Nagar demolitions case?
Despite the Supreme Court’s recent observation in Imran Pratapgarhi’s case requiring the investigating officer, before filing an FIR, to conduct a preliminary enquiry to ascertain prima facie case, the FIR against ‘Ms Medusa’ for her satirical videos repeats a very similar script
Laying down timelines and checking inordinate delays in the Telangana Speaker’s case could be a crucial check by the Supreme Court
The legislation potentially threatens the guarantees enshrined under Articles 26, 25, 21, and 14 and also the procedural safeguards supplied by the Fifth Schedule
On April 1, when a bench of Justices Bela Trivedi and Satish Sharma lambasted a young AOR who was previously directed to embarrassingly show his travel tickets for absence in an earlier hearing, members of the SCBA and SCAORA stood firmly by their colleague. In India, where the Bar and the Bench remain in a hierarchical, unequal arrangement, this was a crucial moment of resistance