Comprehensive coverage, analysis, and breaking news on supreme court.
The Court will decide whether a Muslim woman can unilaterally terminate her marriage through Khula without the consent of her husband, raising a substantial question of Muslim personal law.
Ayush Kumar
Staff Writer
CJI Surya Kant’s proposal misses the point that the 2023 Handbook could be made more accessible to trial judges, not through ‘fine-tuning’, but through supplementary training.
The Court questioned banks’ failure to flag suspicious transactions and directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to implement a nationwide SOP to curb digital arrest scams.
Appearing in person before the Supreme Court, Mamata Banerjee alleged that 58 lakh voters were deleted in the draft SIR by micro-observers from BJP-ruled states, while the ECI claimed the state government failed to provide adequate officers.
“We cannot allow the law to be taken into someone’s hands,” CJI Kant observed, emphasising that the ECI has to act if there is a law-and-order situation.
Appearing for the Kerala government, Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta informed the Court that the Chancellor (the Governor) had filed an affidavit explaining his decisions taken by him.
An insistence on a ‘Swadeshi’ interpretation without addressing the question of social inequities in our society will roll back our progress on constitutional governance and liberties.
Senior Advocate A.M. Singhvi argued that the ECI was exceeding its constitutional mandate by turning the electoral roll revision into a citizenship determination process.
The matter has now been referred to a three-judge bench and listed for January 21, 2026.
The Chief Justice reiterated that only scientific and expert assessments can guide meaningful policy responses.
The oath ceremony took place this morning at the Durbar Hall of Rashtrapati Bhavan, now renamed Ganatantra Mandap.
The petition argues that the Election Commission’s rushed revision exercise is arbitrary, lacks statutory basis and risks disenfranchising marginalised voters.
Over the past decade, the new normal has been an increasing decline in standards of judicial independence and integrity. As the 52nd chief justice retires, we reflect on his complicated legacy as a jurist, an administrator, and a Dalit chief justice in a withering democracy.
Justice Gavai has followed the practice initiated by his immediate predecessor, Justice Sanjiv Khanna
Emphasising that courts cannot prescribe “judicially mandated timelines,” nor invoke Article 142 to create “deemed assent,” the Bench overruled the Court’s April 8 judgment.
President Droupadi Murmu, invoking Article 143(1), had referred 14 questions to the Court on May 15, 2025.
The Court noted that the Centre had effectively brought back what had already been quashed in previous rulings.
In a petition filed through the Chief Secretary, the State said the manner in which the SIR is being undertaken is “not conducive to the democratic polity of the country”.
During the proceedings, the ED opposed any dilution of the bail conditions.
On Wednesday, the Court had asked Punjab and Haryana governments to inform it of the concrete steps being undertaken to address crop-residue burning.
The Centre, through Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, meanwhile maintained that no blame was being cast on the pilot.
The acquittal brings to fore the immense significance of the Supreme Court-innovated extraordinary jurisdiction of curative, specifically in cases concerning life and liberty and death penalty.
The Court further held that it would be the duty of local authorities to identify, capture, and relocate stray dogs from these institutions/areas to authorised shelters after vaccination and sterilisation.
The petitioner argued that the ongoing inquiry by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau lacked independence and raised apprehensions that the pilot might be unfairly held responsible for the tragedy.
The 7-judge bench decision did not truly resolve the legal dispute, instead pirouetting around its core, shadowboxing with half-arguments while leaving the heart of the matter suspended in mid-air for a 3-Judge Bench to factually determine.
Questioning the AG’s suggestion to refer the matter to a Constitution Bench, CJI Gavai had pointedly asked, on November 3, whether this was a “ploy” to avoid his Bench.
The Bench took note of the affidavits filed by the various States and Union Territories regarding compliance with the Animal Birth Control Rules.
Our summary of the Supreme Court's 78 page judgment, which practitioners have claimed "has far-reaching implications for the future".
The petition notes that Wangchuk’s decades of contributions to education, innovation, and green technology have strengthened, not undermined, India’s interests.
On August 22, a three-judge Bench comprising Justices Nath, Mehta, and Anjaria had modified its earlier August 11 order on stray dogs, clarifying that captured dogs must be sterilised, dewormed, vaccinated, and released back to their original localities.
As CJI Gavai recommends Justice Kant to succeed him as India’s 53rd chief justice, The Leaflet looks back at his judicial legacy, spanning from upholding the revocation of Article 370 to granting bail in many high stakes matters.
With each passing month of the 2023 law remaining under enactment, a process solidifies in which the executive imposes power on the organ charged with overseeing it.
“Consent from the Attorney General has already been granted for contempt proceedings. Social media is going wild over it,” SCBA President Vikas Singh said, pressing for an early hearing.
Invoking the principle of proportionality, the Court said a “balanced approach” was required to reconcile the citizens’ right to celebrate festivals with the imperative of protecting public health and the environment.
Refusing to entertain the PIL, the Court observed that the petitioner was free to approach the Election Commission of India (‘ECI’) instead.
The controversy stems from the Election Commission’s order of February 17, 2023, which recognised Eknath Shinde’s group as the “real Shiv Sena” and allotted it the party’s reserved election symbol.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Angmo, argued that the detention was illegal under Article 22 of the Constitution as the grounds of detention had not been furnished to the family.
While there have been past instances of Supreme Court judges facing physical attacks by disgruntled litigants, this one seems to be inspired by hatred towards CJI Gavai, who hails from a Dalit, Buddhist background.
In its September 15 order greenlighting Ambani’s Vantara project, the Supreme Court issued an honorarium of 9 lakhs to the three SIT members which concluded investigation in only 17 days. A broader question arises: should there be a consistent framework to determine SIT honorariums?
Over three days of hearings, the top Court heard contentions surrounding its 2020 decision in the Dheeraj More case which had noted that only practising advocates with seven years of continuous practice were eligible for direct recruitment to District Judge.