Comprehensive coverage, analysis, and breaking news on leaflet specials.
In his foreword to The Leaflet’s Republic Day Special Issue 2026, Senior Advocate Mohan Katarki situates constitutional discourse around 75 years of the Constitution in an era of ideological contestation.
Mohan V Katarki
Staff Writer
We, at The Leaflet, synthesised nearly thirty pieces of public-facing short-form commentary, over forty hours of panels and speeches, and five books – all commemorating the Constitution and Supreme Court at 75 – to read between the lines of how India’s commentators debated its constitutional legacy.
Our Constitution Day Special Issue poses one simple question: Without morally conceding to executive primacy in appointments, is there a way to imagine a more democratic future to how our judges are appointed?
12 years after his retirement, Justice Chandru recalls the many twists and turns that preceded his appointment as a judge of the Madras HC, and what they revealed about the Collegium system’s deepest problems.
Despite the wide ambit of discretion our judges are required to exercise, our legal system tries to ensure at the time of appointments that judges’ decisions conform to the legal method. But what happens when these mechanisms start failing?
In May 2025, CJI Sanjiv Khanna released two documents on the processes behind appointments to the Supreme Court and High Courts. But why have successive CJIs meandered on the question of making judicial appointments transparent?
The issue isn’t judges’ political leanings, but whether the Collegium can create a clearer way to account for potential appointees who’ve shown prejudice against any group of citizens.
There are, today, multifrontal questions confronting the election architecture of India. In a time when its own integrity is under question, why is the EC unwilling to disclose information when millions of voters risk disenfranchisement? Has the judiciary been able to provide an accountability mechanism? And why, at 79 years, is the right to vote still not being considered a fundamental one?
Our Independence Day 2025 special issue urges us to look at how the battle for universal adult franchise is now being fought along new frontlines.
The voter fraud allegations have thrown open an undeniable crack in our constitutional framework - the failure to constitutionally protect the independence of the ECI from Parliament and the Government. And increasingly, the fault lines have become difficult to ignore.
The Election Commission’s intensive revision exercise in Bihar diverges from Ambedkar and Gandhi’s articulate imaginations of mass enfranchisement.
Who are the residents, and who are the encroachers? Across informal settlements in India’s urban centres, ceaseless demolitions, combined with judicial complicity, have emerged as means of engineering working class populations out of the electoral process. In response, the affected have invoked their suffrage.
Theoretically, adult suffrage under Article 326 of the Constitution is decoupled from housing status, ensuring that the right to vote cuts across social divisions. But the recent spate of demolitions without rehabilitation and the corresponding weaponisation of Form 7 has birthed a mechanism to purge the poor from democratic participation.
The new Labour Codes effectuate a framework of forced labour when it comes to domestic workers. But to start a truthful conversation on domestic workers’ rights, we need a thorough introspection on the labour of care work and the politics of dignity in the caste-community complex of Indian society
Pitting trade unions in an unequal footing against employers, too much discretion to executive, doing away with punitive measures against employers - the Labour Codes could give employers the license to practice forced labour. We must, learning from both our history and from the experience across the world, recognise that the rights we win will be meaningful and substantive only if they are truly universal in their reach
Even as India reports among the worst performance on gender gaps in both employment and wage, the ‘ease of doing business’ geared labour codes only further reinforce the de-equalisation of gender in labour
The Foxconn factory at Tamil Nadu has emerged as a site where women workers have faced unsafe, exploitative and discriminatory work conditions, representative indeed of the true position of women workers in the formal sector - forced to work in sweatshops, with heavy workload, and poorly informed of their rights under labour laws.
In the first of this three part series special on the critical challenges to science, health and human rights in the US under the Trump administration, we explore the cascading effects of the closing down of major government projects
The major flexibilities in the Indian Patent Act - Section 3(d) and the compulsory licensing system - to make medicines affordable, have been under-implemented. As prices of medicines have skyrocketed, secondary patenting has proliferated while compulsory licensing has been invoked only once
Two recent interim orders of the Supreme Court to stay High Court decisions which enabled access to treatment for rare diseases are not only morally and ethically concerning but also block the treatment of people living with rare diseases
Strengthening quality assurance at the time of approval of medicines at the State level and endorsing a pro-public health patent system will be crucial to sustain India’s ability to supply quality, affordable medicines worldwide
Contrary to the Bhore Committee’s vision of an egalitarian and humane healthcare framework, India has systematically stifled public healthcare, endorsing in its stead an essentially unregulated private sector, straying further from the goal of effectuating the constitutional right to health
Over a hundred and forty years since discovering the Mycobacterium tuberculosis, we have not yet eradicated the disease. As we continue to embrace a “wasteful, inefficient” treatment method and now face serious cuts to TB research expenditures by the United States, a renewed commitment to a community-driven, people-centred, response is crucial.
The Trump administration’s decision to withdraw from the WHO weakens the international system of global health cooperation and undermines global pandemic preparedness. But it is also an opportunity to innovate a new paradigm of global health governance - of increased regional collaborations and critical reforms in the WHO
The hard-fought spirit of community mobilisation which informed a successful global fight against the HIV pandemic has been vastly undone by the twisted COVID response engineered by developed nations and Big Pharma
“This government is bringing in laws, and using language which has fostered an atmosphere of hatred. In such a situation, if you go to the State, the latter will use the issue of women to target the Muslim community.”
Our study involving over seventy women’s rights organisations in India revealed that between December 2022 and June 2023, the pervasive fear of shutdowns has stifled feminist uprising. Crackdown on foreign funded organisations through the FCRA has paralysed advocacy and policy work across the space generally and particularly by Dalit and Muslim women’s organisations, where domestic funding has been scarce. The long term consequences of this systemic backlash are yet to play out.
In the last three months, the popular discourse surrounding the notion that progressive laws enacted to protect women are being ‘grossly misused’ seems to have reached a fever pitch. The Supreme Court, itself, in the past has deployed phrases such as “legal terrorism” to perpetuate a distorted, if not completely fictional, account of the large-scale exploitations of these legal regimes to harass men and in-laws. But where are the statistics that remotely establish any such conclusion? And, where are these women accused widely of ‘misuse’?
A systematic, critical reading of the Union’s submissions in the Supreme Court’s pending case on the constitutionality of the marital rape exemption is also an exercise of resistance. By re-orienting the conversation of rape trials around gender-based violence, we could respond most effectively to the backlash against feminist struggles in our courts, and outside them.
If the last five years of legal developments are any indication, reproductive rights in India have occupied an increasingly shrinking space. A range of recent statutory instruments, delegated legislations and policies, as well as judicial decisions, have chipped away at these reproductive rights through cumbersome procedural requirements, extensive state surveillance and reporting norms.
Adivasi women exemplify a confounding intersectional position within India’s societal structure. As part of a broader community-level assertion for land and resources, Adivasi women have played crucial roles. Yet, Adivasi women’s struggle for inheritance has resisted both customary laws and the State’s historic, oppressive imposition of land acquisition policies.
Twelve years ago, the Indian legislature enacted the Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act. Despite the Supreme Court’s repeated acknowledgement of problems with the law’s implementation, critical procedural hurdles, inconsistent court rulings, and lack of awareness within the informal economy sustain the challenge of its enforcement.
On International Women’s Day 2025, we are introducing a special issue curating writings that articulate the multi-faceted backlash against India’s feminist movements, effectuated through our courts, the legislature and the executive. As hard-fought feminist gains are resisted and diluted by dominant interests, this special issue makes a simple, but profound argument - if the law can betray, it can also be reclaimed.
This Republic Day, this article, the first in the series related to the illegal detention of foreigners in Assam, examines domestic and global laws allowing such unfettered powers to governments.
On this Republic Day, as we reflect on the progress and challenges of our democracy, the judiciary must confront its shortcomings and recommit to its foundational principles of justice and equality, writes Naina Bhargava.
We need to salvage this great republic. Only jana gana can do it, writes S.N. Sahu.
India is here to stand, but if it wants to stand tall, it needs to address issues that weigh it down, writes Mohammad Wasim.
Who can say that there will not be any larger Bench constituted in the near future involving the same point of law potentially relying upon any of the dissenting opinions marked above, writes Gyanvi Khanna.
A selection of books for the lawman and the layman, read in 2024, for the year 2025.
Arvind Narrain presents a list of books read in 2024 so that ‘truth may dazzle gradually’.