Comprehensive coverage, analysis, and breaking news on opinion.
The SCOTUS’s rejection of Trump’s tariff regime highlights the judiciary’s role in safeguarding constitutional limits on executive power, offering lessons for the Indian Supreme Court’s review of the SIR process.
S.N. Sahu
Staff Writer
The US Supreme Court’s ruling against President Trump’s tariff regime reasserts congressional authority over taxation, raising fundamental questions about executive power, economic policy and the political future of the administration.
CJI Surya Kant’s proposal misses the point that the 2023 Handbook could be made more accessible to trial judges, not through ‘fine-tuning’, but through supplementary training.
Amidst eroding trust on the Speaker’s impartiality, a recent instruction by PMO to block discussions on PM-CARES fund is constitutionally worrisome.
The Chief Justice of India’s recent remarks, and a spate of agitations led by the Hindu right against the new UGC Regulations to tackle caste-discrimination in campuses seek to undo our progress towards substantive equality.
Part II of our two-part special on the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation explores how India is in violation of domestic, international and universal law on the issue of FGM.
On the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, Part I of this two-part series explores how international law recognizes FGM as torture—and why, as a jus cogens norm, the prohibition against torture cannot be derogated from under any circumstances.
Lost submissions and a preparation in vain – just another Tuesday where ‘final’ arguments are not so final.
Justice Bhuyan’s recent critical remarks on the Collegium transferring judges at the ‘government’s request’ brings to memory a long list of judicial transfers that denote executive interference in judicial appointments.
While elitist historiography has predominantly narrated the Constitution as a liberal achievement, its radical re-reading reveals an exclusionary framework towards religious minorities, sexual subalterns, the disabled and the labouring bodies.
A decade after Rohith Vemula’s passing, a series of matters before the Supreme Court - Amit Kumar, Abeda Tadvi, and now challenge to the new UGC Regulations - are testing its ability to account for structural factors behind student suicides across India’s higher education spaces.
In his new monthly column for The Leaflet, ‘Relief Pending’, lawyer Anirudh Gotety seeks to examine the state of private law adjudication in India and highlight gaps in private and commercial law with a view to informing policy reform.
In his foreword to The Leaflet’s Republic Day Special Issue 2026, Senior Advocate Mohan Katarki situates constitutional discourse around 75 years of the Constitution in an era of ideological contestation.
We, at The Leaflet, synthesised nearly thirty pieces of public-facing short-form commentary, over forty hours of panels and speeches, and five books – all commemorating the Constitution and Supreme Court at 75 – to read between the lines of how India’s commentators debated its constitutional legacy.
As structural vulnerabilities in the Collegium system become harder to ignore, the need for a Judicial Council emerges as a constitutional necessity, not a political concession.
Legal scholar Arvind Narrain reviews ten books he read over last year that engage with the complex truths of law and political transformations - from a post-370 Kashmir to an alternative thinking on the Indian Constitution.
From Macaulay’s push for British conquest of India to the US’s takeover of Venezuela, the idea of peace has remained a crucial instrument of violent modern imperialism, all upheld through the structure of the liberal international legal order.
Between urgent briefs and empty corridors, India’s young lawyers learn the cost of ambition showing up every day – bruised, hopeful, and calling survival a career.
With one stroke, working journalists and other workmen in newspaper establishments have lost labour benefits they have enjoyed since 1955, when two protective laws were first legislated to protect their service conditions and rates of wages.
Far from being a political afterthought, India's secular character is deeply rooted in the freedom struggle, Constituent Assembly debates, and the Constitution's core guarantees of equality and religious freedom
How the Supreme Court’s differential approach to bail for Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam undermines binding precedent on bail and personal liberty
In both the Bhima Koregaon and Delhi riots cases, a wrongful invoking of UAPA and obdurate refusal to follow precedent on delay in trial, raise legitimate questions on the independence of the judiciary.
India’s refusal to accept individual complaints under the ICCPR leaves political prisoners without international recourse, unless civil society chooses to act.
A close reading of the Delhi High Court’s suspension of sentence in the Unnao rape case highlights the risks of resolving statutory meanings at the interim stage.
Let's not get negative this new year. The lawyers will travel. The juniors will stay back. The files will wait. Justice takes its annual breath—shallow, insincere, and expected by everyone.
The US blockade of Venezuela implicates aggression, self-defence, and the prohibition on the use of force under international law.
The question of whether the VB G RAM G bill ushers in a new era of rural employment guarantee or completely dissolves its future is a weighty one.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene in Samuel Kamalesan exposes how judicial deference and legislative silence together shape the operation of Article 33.
As courts move away from insulating personal laws, Assam’s new law brings long-standing tensions between personal law, gender justice, and fundamental rights back into sharp focus.
Two forgotten labour commission reports from the early 2000s had key lessons for the future of social security in India.
The authority of the Indian Constitution was not divinely ordained or violently seized, but legally transferred and morally grounded in the will of the people.
Even after embracing new faiths, Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims continue to face caste-based exclusion. Yet a 1950 Presidential Order blocks them from constitutional protection.
An insistence on a ‘Swadeshi’ interpretation without addressing the question of social inequities in our society will roll back our progress on constitutional governance and liberties.
A law that was once envisioned to protect the coast has now been converted into an instrument for steady erasure of coastal assets, clearly signalling the Environment Ministry’s abandoning of its mandate to look after India’s coasts.
On October 8, when over 170 huts in Prem Nagar basti were demolished, the Haryana government cited a Punjab and Haryana HC order. The residents, however, contest the grounds.
Our Constitution Day Special Issue poses one simple question: Without morally conceding to executive primacy in appointments, is there a way to imagine a more democratic future to how our judges are appointed?
12 years after his retirement, Justice Chandru recalls the many twists and turns that preceded his appointment as a judge of the Madras HC, and what they revealed about the Collegium system’s deepest problems.
Despite the wide ambit of discretion our judges are required to exercise, our legal system tries to ensure at the time of appointments that judges’ decisions conform to the legal method. But what happens when these mechanisms start failing?
In May 2025, CJI Sanjiv Khanna released two documents on the processes behind appointments to the Supreme Court and High Courts. But why have successive CJIs meandered on the question of making judicial appointments transparent?